Monday, 20 October 2014

Holder rips Panetta for dissing Obama


Washington (CNN) -- Attorney General Eric Holder took aim at former Defense and CIA chief Leon Panetta on Monday, whose recently-published memoir accused President Barack Obama of vacillating over policy in Syria and damaging U.S. credibility.


Holder, in an interview with CNN, defended the president's decisiveness and said Panetta acted improperly by dishing on the president.





AG Holder reveals his biggest failure

"I think [what] Leon said in the book is unfortunate. But frankly, I don't think it's something that a former Cabinet member should do while the president he served is still in office," Holder said. "That's not something that I would even consider doing."


Former defense secretary lays out disagreements with President Obama


Holder in the coming weeks is set to conclude his tenure as one of the original members of Obama's cabinet.


He announced plans to retire when the Senate confirms his successor. The White House says the president will announce a nominee after the midterm elections.


Holder said Panetta's characterization of the president is inaccurate.


"The president is a deliberate person in an appropriate way. But he's also resolute once he makes up his mind," Holder told CNN. "Let's remember, this is the president who took a chance in going after Osama bin Laden in the way that he did. He has been decisive in a whole variety of areas to keep the American people safe in doing it in a way that's consistent with our values.


When he leaves, Holder said, he plans to catch up on sleep and then perhaps take a long cross-country driving vacation, including visiting the Grand Canyon for the first time. Any later plans will have to wait, he said.



Suspects sought in pumpkin melee





  • City officials in Keene, New Hampshire, say at least 30 hurt in melee

  • Police want to find people who threw rocks, bottles

  • Police will seek suspects through social media

  • Disturbance broke out at the city's annual pumpkin festival




(CNN) -- The police department in Keene, New Hampshire, wants to identify and prosecute the people who threw objects at police, overturned a car, set fires and engaged in other "riotous behavior" Saturday and Sunday at the city's annual Pumpkin Festival, the city government said Monday.


The fire department treated 30 people for injuries, mostly those hit by thrown objects, law enforcement authorities said at a news conference.





Dozens arrested at Pumpkin Festival

Full bottles and cans of alcohol and even billiard balls were hurled through the air, police said. People shouted expletives at officers, started fires in the road and flipped over a vehicle, Keene Police Chief Kenneth Meola said. Crowds were so hostile that firefighters had trouble reaching the injured, he said.


Eighty-four people were arrested over the weekend, Meola said, and more arrests are expected.


Police said high school and college students used social media to spread word about the event, held near Keene State College. The school's president, Anne Huot said some outside the community had billed the event "as a destination for destructive and raucous behavior."


Steven French, 18, who was visiting from Haverhill, Massachusetts, described the chaotic scene to the local paper, The Keene Sentinel, as "wicked."


"It's just like a rush. You're revolting from the cops," he told the paper Saturday night. "It's a blast to do things that you're not supposed to do."


Students could be expelled


Many of the suspects are from other New England colleges and the schools will trade information in an attempt to locate the suspects, Huot told reporters.


Besides being charged with crimes, Keene State students could be expelled if they participated, she said.


Police said they'll use social media in trying to locate and identify suspects.


Meola said the problem started about 1 p.m. Saturday when police tried to break up an unruly crowd of about 1,000 people at the festival. Police in riot gear used tear gas and pepper spray to to disperse the group.


A second group of about the same size also started throwing objects at police, he said. The groups eventually moved to another spot where they were partially contained, Meola said. Some of the suspects spilled over onto the campus and damaged property there, he said.


"This went on for approximately eight hours," he said.


"The potential for somebody being seriously injured or killed was there," said Col. Robert Quinn of the New Hampshire State Police.


Police used about 100 pepper balls and finally ran out, Meola said. Officers then resorted to "sponge rounds," which he said were "similar to an extended baton kind of stroke."


Police had problems last year


Keene police called in backup from the New Hampshire State Police and other nearby police forces.


Most of the injured were students.


"I got hit with a Jack Daniel's (whiskey) bottle, like across the face," Keene State student Roger Creekmore told WMUR.


The disturbances started early Saturday afternoon. Bonfires burned into the early hours of Sunday morning on city streets that were littered with broken beer and liquor bottles, video from CNN affiliate WMUR showed.


Police reported problems at last year's pumpkin festival, but not to this extent, Meola said. The Sentinel reported 140 arrests last year.


"This wasn't like a party we had to go break up," he said. "This was out in the public. Nobody organized it. It happened on its own."


Because of the arrests and injuries at past festivals, the community held forums in recent years -- inviting police and emergency room doctors as well as residents -- to explore ways to mitigate the violence, vandalism and littering that come with the celebration.


Town to discuss festival future


Keene Mayor Kendall W. Lane said public forums will be held in December to discuss the future of the Pumpkin Festival. This was the 24th consecutive year it's been held.


Huot said she was encouraged to see many students come out voluntarily Sunday morning to help clean up the debris from the disturbance.


The pumpkin festival is a source of pride for the community of 23,000 people about 80 miles northwest of Boston. Last year, the event set a world record with 30,581 lit jack-o'-lanterns, according to the festival's website.


"It's ridiculous. It's not Pumpkin Fest," Jacob Gowans, another Keene State student, told WMUR. "We're supposed to have a fun weekend. This is stupid."


CNN's Joe Sutton, Jackie Castillo and Ed Payne contributed to this report



Judge scolds lawyer with baby in court





  • Judge denies lawyer's request to delay hearing while she was on maternity leave

  • Lawyer brought 4-week-old to hearing, got earful from judge when baby cried

  • Women across the country were outraged the judge did not delay the hearing

  • Women say case shows workplaces don't understand demands of working parents




Editor's note: Kelly Wallace is CNN's digital correspondent and editor-at-large covering family, career and life. She is a mom of two girls. Read her other columns and follow her reports at CNN Parents and on Twitter.


(CNN) -- When I first heard the story about an Atlanta judge who reportedly reprimanded an immigration attorney for bringing her 4-week-old to court for a hearing -- a hearing she asked the judge to reschedule because she was on her six-week maternity leave -- I was outraged like many other working women.


What appears to be a lack of compassion by the judge in question is troubling but sadly not surprising, many women say.


"Hearings are rescheduled all the time for a variety of reasons," said Avital Norman Nathman, editor of the motherhood anthology "The Good Mother Myth" and a mom of a 7-year-old. "To not reschedule a hearing because a lawyer is on maternity leave is appalling and disrespectful toward the attorney on both a professional and personal level."


Valerie Young, who practiced maritime law for more than a decade before becoming a policy analyst with Mom-mentum, formerly known as the National Association of Mothers' Centers, said maternity leave is "generally regarded as a 'vacation' by the profession."





The good ol' days of parenting




Top 5 parenting mistakes

"The judiciary continues to be majority 'pale, male and stale,' like most positions of power and authority in this country," she said. "I heard counsel (usually male) plead trial conflicts, planned vacation and even time off for custodial visits with their kids ('Your honor, I only get them for two weeks every summer') and the court always accommodated those other commitments."


There was plenty of comment, too, about what this story says about the state of maternity leave policies in our country.


READ: Work-life balance is not just a women's issue


"Why is it that the United States is so slow at accepting what so many other countries already know -- that nurturing, caring and being 'present' in the life of a newborn/infant is crucial for development and bonding?" said Louise Sattler, an educational psychologist and owner of a business providing sign language instruction.


But the larger outrage may be in reaction to how immigration Judge J. Dan Pelletier Sr. reportedly scolded Stacy Ehrisman-Mickle for bringing her child to court, when the infant, strapped in a baby carrier, started to cry during the hearing.


Did the judge assume the mom would have chosen to bring her child to a hearing instead of leaving the infant in the care of someone she trusted? Would any woman have truly chosen that option unless she felt she had no other choice?





Sarah McLachlan on parenting, music, sex




Breasts, babies and Jason Biggs

Ehrisman-Mickle's husband, a truck driver, was out of state; she had no family in the area and her child was too young for day care, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. She asked her doctor if it would be OK to bring the baby to court and the doctor told her she could as long as she used a baby carrier and did not let anyone touch the baby.


Ironically, Pelletier, after the baby started crying, apparently said her doctor must be furious that she was exposing the baby to so many germs by bringing the child to court.


READ: Are moneymaking moms less happy?


"As for this specific situation, this was a case of 'common sense' not showing up to court," said Sattler. "This mother, who was given purportedly little to no choice, had to compromise the health of her child to appease the inflexible court system."


The story is just one case and certainly does not mean that all employers would have handled the situation the same way. But it does show how far we still need to go to get to a point where workplaces -- from courtrooms to corner offices -- are understanding about the demands of today's working parents and how sometimes it is impossible to truly separate work and family.


Cynthia Lieberman, a social and media strategist who owns and runs a private consulting firm, said that when her kids were younger, she worked in a high-ranking position for a 50-year-old woman who did not have children.


"On one rare occasion when I had a childcare emergency, she sniffed, 'That's why I don't like having women with children work for me,'" said Lieberman, who is also co-founder of Cyberwise.org, a digital literacy site for adults and children.


"Her 'coldness' and discriminatory behavior toward working mothers was a core problem, and I ultimately left a great job for a great company for a more friendly and empathetic environment (and never looked back)," she said.


READ: Microsoft CEO's gender gaffe: Worrisome for women




CNN\'s Kelly Wallace talks to women who were outraged after a judge scolded a lawyer for bringing her baby to court.

CNN's Kelly Wallace talks to women who were outraged after a judge scolded a lawyer for bringing her baby to court.



That said, there are examples of employers who seem to get it.


I remembered an anecdote first lady Michelle Obama likes to share about how she took her then-infant Sasha with her on a job interview with the University of Chicago Medical Center.


She said she was a breastfeeding mother of a 4-month-old who didn't have a babysitter, so she took Sasha with her.


"I thought, look, this is who I am," she told attendees at the White House Working Families Summit held in June. "I've got a husband who's away. I've got two little babies. They are my priority. If you want me to do the job, you've got to pay me to do the job and you've got to give me flexibility."


She ended up getting the job.


Pam Moore, who blogs about motherhood, fitness, home birth and life in Boulder, Colorado, recounted a similar experience. She brought her 4-month-old with her to a work review while still out on maternity leave.


"My supervisor had no problem with it," said Moore, host of the blog Whatevs. "I even nursed her during our conversation when she started to fuss. If my supervisor was shocked or offended, she did not let on."


PHOTOS: Moms, stop all the judgment!



Don't miss out on the conversation we're having at CNN Living. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook for the latest stories and tell us what's influencing your life.


Stacey Ferguson, a former practicing attorney and mother of three, said she almost never brought a child to work and would never have done so if she needed to be in court. (She sympathized with Ehrisman-Mickle but thought she should have found a sitter for her baby or at least someone to watch the infant outside the courtroom until the proceedings were over.)


"I fortunately had a workplace that was family friendly and a boss who was understanding in this regard," said Ferguson, who is known as Justice Fergie online and is founder of Justice Fergie Lifestyle Media and co-founder of Blogalicious. She was able to telecommute one day a week and work four days per week toward the end of her tenure at her federal agency.


That level of flexibility isn't available to all parents, but compassion from bosses and colleagues should be a given in the workplace.


Have you ever been reprimanded for bringing your child to work? Tell Kelly Wallace on Twitter or CNN Living on Facebook .



Why can't the Catholic Church change?





  • Bishops bickered throughout a major meeting on Catholic doctrine

  • Pope Francis kept largely silent throughout the debate

  • Catholic teaching is not easy to change




(CNN) -- As Catholic bishops in Rome began a major meeting on modern family life two weeks ago, Pope Francis encouraged them to speak candidly and "without timidness."


He certainly got what he asked for.


Bishops bickered. Conservatives contemplated conspiracy theories. Liberals lamented their colleagues' rigidity.


Through it all, the Pope stayed silent.


Even when a report emerged from the bishops' meeting that welcomed gays and lesbians in strikingly open terms, Francis didn't say a word.





Catholic church changing tone on gays?




Pope Francis indicates talk of inclusion




Cardinal hails language on gays, lesbians

Even when that welcome was watered down, not once, but twice, and then, on Saturday, largely scrapped, the Pope revealed nothing.


By the midpoint of the meeting -- officially called the Synod of the Bishops on Pastoral Challenges to the Family -- conservatives were complaining that Francis had "done a lot of harm" by not making his own views known.


But if Francis had spoken, it would have shut down the very debate he wanted to spark, Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi, a close ally of the Pope's, told reporters.


"Roma locuta, causa finita," Ravasi said. That's Latin for, "Rome has spoken, the case is closed." (The Pope is the bishop of Rome.)


Finally, as the meeting closed on Saturday afternoon, the Pope addressed the nearly 200 bishops he had summoned to Rome.


In a widely praised speech, he told them the church must find a middle path between showing mercy toward people on the margins and holding tight to church teachings.


What's more, he said, church leaders still have a year to find "concrete solutions" to the problems plaguing modern families -- from war and poverty to hostility toward nontraditional unions. A follow-up meeting is scheduled for next October in Rome.


All of this may raise a few questions in people's minds. If the Pope is the head of the church, why can't he just make changes on his own? Why are so many Catholics resistant to revising church teaching? And what does all of this have to do with Jesus?


Here are some things to keep in mind.


WWJD?


Jesus didn't often talk about practical matters, scholars say, but he did talk about divorce.


"I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery," Jesus says in the Gospel of Matthew.


That statement may sound reactionary today, said Candida Moss, a scholar of New Testament and early Christianity, but it was actually pretty progressive at the time.


"In a world in which women had to be married to be successful," she said, "being this stringent about divorce actually helped those women." It especially helped women callously discarded by their husbands, which was allowed under Mosaic law, Moss added.


So, when Catholic bishops debate whether to allow divorced and remarried Catholics to receive Communion -- as they did in Rome over the past two weeks -- many bring up this teaching from Jesus.


If Jesus said it, the logic goes, the church can't change it.


Tradition


The Catholic Church traces its roots to Peter, whom Jesus gave the keys to heaven and who is considered by many to be the first bishop of Rome -- a sort of proto-pope, if you will.


Between then and now, a span of more than 2,000 years, the church has accrued layers upon layers of teachings and traditions. Catholics call this the "deposit of the faith," and many conservatives say the job of modern church leaders is to guard it, not change it.


In fact, as truth -- with a capital T -- some conservatives argue that even the Pope can never change it.


"The Pope, more than anyone else as the pastor of the universal church, is bound to serve the truth," Cardinal Raymond Burke, a leading conservative, told Buzzfeed recently.


"The Pope is not free to change the church's teachings with regard to the immorality of homosexual acts or the insolubility of marriage or any other doctrine of the faith."


Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York, another prominent church leader, suggested that doctrine could change, but only if the Pope called an ecumenical council.


More liberal church leaders argue that core Catholic teachings can evolve over time, as they did, for example, on slavery.


"Doctrine develops," German Cardinal Reinhard Marx said last week. "Saying that doctrine will never change is a restrictive view of things."


In the war of words between conservative and liberal Catholics, the biggest battle is here: what can and cannot change about the church's moral tenets.


The church universal


The Catholic Church has an estimated 1.2 billion members spread across hundreds of countries from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe. In many of those countries, ethics, particularly sexual ethics, differ widely.


For instance, in Africa, 75% of Catholics believe that divorced and remarried Catholics are "living in sin" and should not receive Holy Communion. In the United States and Latin America, just 30% agree.


On same-sex marriage, the gulf is just as wide. Africa (99%) and the Philippines (84%) reject same-sex marriage, while a slim majority of Catholics in the United States support it.


The Pope, as head of the whole Catholic Church, has to consider all of his far-flung flock -- not just cater to a particular segment, said the Rev. James Martin, a Jesuit priest and author of the book "Jesus: A Pilgrimage."


"While he is interested in being prophetic and moving things forward, you can't move so fast that you lose an entire wing or geographic section of the church."


The old guard


For nearly 35 years, the Catholic Church was led by two popes -- Saint John Paul II and Benedict XVI -- who held fast to traditional church teachings, and part of their mission was to appoint hundreds of bishops who share that view.


As a result, conservative bishops hold top positions in many dioceses across the world and in the Vatican itself.


"These are people who have spent a lot of time accruing power and supporters, and they feel very strongly" about the church not changing, Moss said.


Since his election in 2013, though, Francis has slowly but surely reversed that trend.


The Pope has appointed moderates in several big dioceses, including in Chicago earlier this fall, and he's removed some archconservatives from their posts.


Burke, for example, who is something of a hero to traditionalists, confirmed last week that he's been ousted from the Vatican's supreme court.


So, while many liberals expressed disappointment that the bishops' surprising welcome to gays was later retracted, others argue that at least the topic is still on the table for the next year's meeting, when the church will make final decisions on these issues.


Put another way, taking "three steps forward, two back, is still going forward," said Marx.



Royal baby's due date revealed





  • The gender of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's second baby is still unknown

  • Catherine suffers from the condition hyperemesis gravidarum, the palace says

  • Prince William and Catherine's first child, Prince George, was born in July 2013

  • An online betting company says bettors are placing their odds on baby No. 2 to be a girl




(CNN) -- The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's second baby is due in April, Britain's royal family announced Monday.


While the public now know when Prince George will have a sibling, the gender of Prince William and Catherine's second baby remains a secret.


"Their Royal Highnesses the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are delighted to confirm they are expecting a baby in April 2015," a statement on the website of the Prince of Wales said.


As during her first pregnancy, Catherine continues to suffer from hyperemesis gravidarum, the palace said. The condition involves nausea and vomiting more severe than the typical morning sickness many women suffer during early pregnancy.





Palace: Kate and William expecting




Royals warn: Back off Prince George

Catherine's condition meant she was forced to cancel some public engagements and led to the couple announcing her pregnancy September 8 before the usual 12-week milestone. The palace said Monday that her condition had improved.


William and Catherine's first child, Prince George, was born in July 2013.


Read: William and Catherine warn paparazzi to back off Prince George


The second child will become fourth in line to the British throne, regardless of gender.


A change in the law last year granting women the same rights of accession to the throne as men means that if the Duchess of Cambridge's baby is a girl, she would be the next in line to the throne after her brother -- even if more sons follow.


Prince Charles is first in line, followed by William, Prince George and then eventually the new baby. The new child will knock future uncle Prince Harry down to fifth.


Read: Why does the "spare heir" matter?


Ladbrokes, a British online betting company, said Monday that bettors are placing their odds on baby No. 2 to be a girl. The heavy favorite for a name? Elizabeth.



SF stations ban song for World Series


Singer Lorde finds herself in the middle of a pre-World Series skirmish between radio stations in San Francisco and Kansas City.


Singer Lorde finds herself in the middle of a pre-World Series skirmish between radio stations in San Francisco and Kansas City.






  • San Francisco stations ban No. 1 hit "Royals" from Bay Area radio prior to World Series

  • Station in Kansas City to put song on heavy rotation on first night of series

  • Giants and Royals face off in Game 1 of World Series Tuesday night




(CNN) -- With the World Series on the line, radio stations in San Francisco aren't taking any chances.


Starting Tuesday the San Francisco Giants will face off against the Kansas City Royals in baseball's championship series, and two local radio stations decided they'd send a message.


"No offense, Lorde, but for the duration of the World Series, KFOG Radio will be a "Royals"-free zone," the radio station posted on it's Facebook page. "We're sure you understand."


7 reasons why Kansas City's a winner


Lorde, the 17-year-old pop star from New Zealand, won a song of the year Grammy earlier this year for her No. 1 hit, "Royals."


KOIT said its ban was prompted by listener complaints.







"So @965KOIT banned the Lorde song Royals? That's awesome!" tweeted someone known as The Sassy PETIT.


But not everyone thinks the ban rules. Louis Vargas opined on KFOG's Facebook page that the ban will make no difference in the series outcome, calling the move absurd. Tony Last complained that the song doesn't actually have "anything to do with the opposing team."


Others commented that the lyrics actually seem to be anti-Royals.


"We'll never be royals," Lorde sings. "It ddn't run in our blood."


Still others, not caught up in the love affair, greeted the announcement with more of a shrug.


"Isn't that song so last year?" commented Jennifer Farr Hutchison on KFOG's Facebook page.


"Feel free to make that a permanent policy," wrote an apparent "Royals" hater.


The Kiwi sensation may be banned in the Bay Area, but in Kansas City they're letting her rule their airwaves.


Kansas City's 99.7 The Point put out a plans to play "Royals" at the top of every hour on the opening night of the World Series.


"A few angry San Franciscans who don't have a song called 'Giants' won't rain on our parade," the station's program director is quoted as saying.



Woman gets stuck inside chimney


A woman was rescued after being trapped in a chimney in Thousand Oaks on Sunday.


A woman was rescued after being trapped in a chimney in Thousand Oaks on Sunday.






  • California woman gets stuck inside the chimney of ex-online beau

  • Rescuers dismantled chimney brick by brick to extricate Genoveva Nunez-Figueroa

  • Homeowner: "I hope she gets help and I hope she stays offline"




(CNN) -- The perils of online dating are well-documented. But the mantle of absurdity in dating folklore might now belong to a Los Angeles-area man, and it's for where his online flame turned up: behind his mantel.


Genoveva Nunez-Figueroa had to be rescued over the weekend after becoming stuck inside of the chimney at a home in Thousand Oaks, California.


According to the Ventura County Sheriff's Office, neighbors called police shortly before dawn Sunday to report the sound of a woman crying in the area.


When they arrived, they found the source of those cries, and then "carefully dismantled" the chimney brick by brick in order to free the spurned and quite sooty 30-year-old.


Nunez-Figueroa, who was conscious and alert, was taken to a hospital for evaluation and then arrested by the Thousand Oaks Police Department, accused of illegal entry and providing false information.


According to the guy who lives inside, it wasn't the first time Nunez-Figueroa -- whom he'd met online and went on a few dates with -- had been "over" to his house.


"She seemed totally cool until the first flag was her actually being on my roof two weeks ago," the unnamed homeowner told CNN affiliate KTLA.


"I hope she gets help, and I hope she stays offline. But even if she doesn't, people are going to know who she is now," he said before looking directly into KTLA's camera and adding, "you're welcome."


CNN's Sonya Hamasaki contributed to this report