Cops out of line in Eric Frein arrest?

An honor guard carries the casket of Cpl. Bryon K. Dickson, a Pennsylvania state trooper, from his funeral service Thursday, September 18, in Scranton, Pennsylvania. Dickson was one of two state troopers shot last week while they were leaving their police barracks in Blooming Grove, Pennsylvania. The other trooper, Alex T. Douglass, was severely wounded.

An honor guard folds a flag from Dickson's casket on September 18.

Law enforcement officers salute as the honor guard arrives for Dickson's funeral service on September 18.

An honor guard carries Dickson's casket before the funeral service.

Law enforcement officers gather before the funeral service.

A law enforcement officer arrives for the funeral service.

Law enforcement officers gather before the funeral service.

A woman embraces a Pennsylvania state trooper during the viewing of Dickson's body Wednesday, September 17, in Scranton.

A Pennsylvania state trooper arrives for the viewing of Dickson's body.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane, left, prepares to enter the Rotunda at Marywood University for the viewing of Dickson's body.

A man and woman embrace outside the viewing.

• Danny Cevallos: Some have questioned whether cops arresting Eric Frein out of line


• They used the slain officer's handcuffs, his squad car, and held suspect at his barracks


• He says there's long tradition of such symbolism. It's no more of a statement than an arrest is


• Cevallos, a defense attorney, says not likely it would be seen as prejudicing arrest, evidence

Editor's note: Danny Cevallos is a CNN legal analyst, criminal defense attorney and partner at Cevallos & Wong, practicing in Pennsylvania and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Follow him on Twitter: @CevallosLaw. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.

(CNN) -- When police arrested Eric Frein, accused in the death of a Pennsylvania state trooper, they symbolically used the equipment of their fallen brother, Cpl. Bryon Dickson, to take Frein into custody.

They drove the suspect in Dickson's police vehicle, put him in Dickson's handcuffs, took him to the barracks where the shooting occurred, and held Frein there until he was moved to the correctional facility in Pike County.

This drew some immediate attention. Some have questioned if these customs constitute the law enforcement equivalent of taunting, possibly prejudicing the arrest and evidence. Others might criticize the expenditure of government resources for purely symbolic gestures—like transporting an ordinary pair of handcuffs great distances, when a pair of local zip-ties could do the job. So, should we discourage these law enforcement traditions?

The legal verdict? Nah.

Let the police do this. And that's coming from a criminal defense attorney.

Using a fallen comrade's equipment to bring in a suspect is hardly new. It's been going on for years, though I could find little information about the origin of this department ritual.

View my Flipboard Magazine.

Is using a slain officer's cuffs tantamount to a public statement about the guilt or innocence of a suspect? Sure, but then again, so is an arrest and indictment. The origin of the cuffs is the least of an arrestee's legal worries.

Should we be spending government resources transporting a specific set of handcuffs or a police vehicle for its symbolic relevance? One might argue that if bringing those handcuffs costs even one dollar more than just using local handcuffs, a merely symbolic gesture may not be warranted.

The reality is that our government spends money on symbolism all the time. Does our government "need" to pay the head coach at the Naval Academy $1.5 million? Is the United States required to send athletes to the Olympics? Do we really even need the White House Rose Garden?

Slain cop's cuffs used to arrest Frein

Police: Glad Frein won't hurt anyone else

Chilling note describes trooper shooting

None of these are technically necessary to the operation of our government, but there is value to demonstrating the majesty of democracy, both at home and abroad. When viewed against some of the other things our government spends money on, requisitioning a pair of special handcuffs for a special arrest hardly seems excessive. Government symbolism has real value; and value sometimes costs real dollars.

Should the police be engaged in any symbolic taunting of suspects? In the vast majority of cases, no. Not just because suspects are presumed innocent, but also because taunting suspects would undermine community confidence in police, and possibly undermine the arrest itself. As it is, an arrest is a public event, and already humiliating enough on its own.

But cop killings are different. Law enforcement is highly protective of its own; a slaying of a fellow officer breaks down all barriers between different departments and agencies. In this case, it is no longer business, it's very personal. After all, it could have been any of them ambushed that day.

Police deal with constant scrutiny—by the community, defense lawyers and even their own prosecutors. Oh, and they can get killed doing their job. It's no surprise they develop an us-against-the-world mentality, which makes the bond among them even stronger.

While departments must closely referee to guard against excessive celebration with suspects, we can probably look the other way when it comes to some strategic use of otherwise standard equipment to honor a comrade.

Read CNNOpinion's new Flipboard magazine .

Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion.

Join us on http://ift.tt/1bl3g0P.