Monday 5 May 2014

Is parental involvement overrated?


Keeping parents informed about their children's progress in school can help with homework completion, the authors say.


Keeping parents informed about their children's progress in school can help with homework completion, the authors say.






  • Writers: Recent articles said helping children with schoolwork has little value

  • They say it's a misreading of research because kids getting help often fare poorly anyway

  • They say numerous studies show grades, attendance improve when parents onboard

  • Writers: Texting parents on progress, holding meetings with teachers critical to success




Editor's note: Todd Rogers is assistant professor of public policy at Harvard Kennedy School. Lucas Coffman is assistant professor of economics at Ohio State University. Peter Bergman is assistant professor of economics and education at Teachers College, Columbia University. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the authors.


(CNN) -- Should you be involved with your children's schooling?


Several recent articles have questioned the common belief that parent involvement is critical to improving student performance in school. One recent New York Times op-ed, titled "Parental Involvement Is Overrated," and an Atlantic piece called "Don't Help Your Kids With Their Homework," touched off a heated discussion online suggesting that parental involvement is of surprisingly little value to student achievement and, if anything, does more harm than good.


This interpretation of the evidence is misguided. Worse, it sends a dangerous message to families and policymakers: Encouraging parental involvement is unlikely to improve educational outcomes or reduce achievement gaps.



Todd Rogers



Lucas Coffman



Peter Bergman


Citing their research, the authors of the Times piece, Keith Robinson and Angel L. Harris, describe provocative findings that show that students of parents who are very involved in their children's education perform worse than students of parents who are less involved.


While the authors control for certain variables, their research only implies there is a relationship between parental involvement and student performance. This caveat is important; the existence of a relationship does not tell us what causes what.


Think of it this way: If you had two children, and one was getting A's and the other C's, which of them would you help more? The C student. An outsider, noticing that you've spent the school year helping only one of your children, might infer that parental help caused that child to earn lower grades. This of course would not be the case, and inferring causation here would be a mistake.


Fortunately, a rapidly growing body of research -- including our own -- looks at whether low-cost parental engagement interventions can cause changes in student performance. We are researchers in economics and psychology who conduct randomized controlled experiments in educational settings.


Randomized experiments, modeled after medical clinical trials, are the "gold standard" for understanding whether a given behavior causes a change in a specific outcome. Results from these experiments suggest that involving parents is a potent, cost-effective and scalable way to increase student achievement in a number of settings.





Are U.S. students falling behind?




Film details impact of race on education




Enrollment up in no-test, no-tech school

Highlights from this new literature include interventions in low-income areas of Brazil, France, India and the United States. Sending parents whose high school children attended school in a low-income area of Los Angeles text messages when their kids miss assignments can cause student performance to increase as much as high-performing charter schools cause student performance to increase. In France, inviting parents to meetings with school staff on how to navigate the transition to middle school and also providing materials on the roles of different school personnel reduces truancy by 25%.


Paying low-income parents in India to improve their children's literacy can be as effective at increasing child literacy as paying the children directly, especially if the parents are literate and have the time and resources to devote to their children. Providing literacy classes for mothers in India can meaningfully increase children's test scores. Asking Boston teachers to call middle school parents in the evening to let them know about their children's academic progress, behavior and upcoming assignments can cut in-class misbehavior by 25% and improve on-time homework completion by 40%.


Delivering brief messages to parents on a weekly basis about what their children are doing well and doing poorly can cut summer school dropout rate almost in half. Sending parents two letters and providing access to a website with information about the usefulness of science, technology, engineering and mathematics, or STEM, classes can increase the number of STEM classes their high school children take by one full semester. Texting poor parents in Brazil if their child skips school can empower parents to compel the child to attend school.


Informing parents of public schools' average test scores leads parents to choose higher performing schools for their children. At H&R Block, allowing parents the option to have a federal financial aid form auto-filled for them using their tax return data can increase the likelihood that their child completes two years of college over the next three years from 28% to 36%. This is a new area of research, and there are more questions than answers, but the results are extremely promising and mutually supporting.


Parents are a cornerstone of educational success, and we need policies that empower, inform and involve them. The good news is that research on what kinds of cost-effective policies this entails is under way.


Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion.


Join us on Facebook/CNNOpinion.



Town eyes name change to Rocky Top






The song "Rocky Top" has become part of the culture among University of Tennessee fans. The song was written by Boudleaux and Felice Bryant in 1967 and was first played by the university band in the early 1970s. Legendary women's basketball coach Pat Summitt has said "Rocky Top" is part of her blood. The song "Rocky Top" has become part of the culture among University of Tennessee fans. The song was written by Boudleaux and Felice Bryant in 1967 and was first played by the university band in the early 1970s. Legendary women's basketball coach Pat Summitt has said "Rocky Top" is part of her blood.

The town of Lake City, Tennessee, has proposed changing its name to Rocky Top as part of a massive development project. The sons of Boudleaux and Felice Bryant have filed suit to block the name change. "Rocky Top is a world-famous and distinctive mark that popularly conjures notions of the copyrighted song," the lawsuit says.The town of Lake City, Tennessee, has proposed changing its name to Rocky Top as part of a massive development project. The sons of Boudleaux and Felice Bryant have filed suit to block the name change. "Rocky Top is a world-famous and distinctive mark that popularly conjures notions of the copyrighted song," the lawsuit says.

"Rocky Top" has become ingrained among thousands of Tennesseans, from the Smoky Mountains in the east to the western bluffs along the Mississippi River. Kelly Lovelace, 24, center, kicks it to the tune of "Rocky Top" with the Riverboat Cloggers during the 2012 Bartlett Festival and Car Show. "Rocky Top" has become ingrained among thousands of Tennesseans, from the Smoky Mountains in the east to the western bluffs along the Mississippi River. Kelly Lovelace, 24, center, kicks it to the tune of "Rocky Top" with the Riverboat Cloggers during the 2012 Bartlett Festival and Car Show.

Developers have proposed a multimillion-dollar project, including a water park and country music theater, if Lake City changes its name to Rocky Top. Mayor Tim Sharp met with reporters last fall when the City Council voted in favor of the change. The state House and Senate have since approved the measure.Developers have proposed a multimillion-dollar project, including a water park and country music theater, if Lake City changes its name to Rocky Top. Mayor Tim Sharp met with reporters last fall when the City Council voted in favor of the change. The state House and Senate have since approved the measure.

Most fans associate "Rocky Top" with the University of Tennessee football program; 100,000 fans pack Neyland Stadium and sing every time the band plays the song. Most fans associate "Rocky Top" with the University of Tennessee football program; 100,000 fans pack Neyland Stadium and sing every time the band plays the song.

"Rocky Top" grew to fame in 1967 when the Osborne Brothers first recorded the bluegrass song. It has since been sung by more than 100 artists and remains a favorite at the Grand Ole Opry. It is one of Tennessee's eight official state songs."Rocky Top" grew to fame in 1967 when the Osborne Brothers first recorded the bluegrass song. It has since been sung by more than 100 artists and remains a favorite at the Grand Ole Opry. It is one of Tennessee's eight official state songs.

The football field in Lake City sits empty most of the year. Officials hope the Rocky Top project will jump-start the local economy and lead to a first-class athletic complex that draws in area youth.The football field in Lake City sits empty most of the year. Officials hope the Rocky Top project will jump-start the local economy and lead to a first-class athletic complex that draws in area youth.









  • Tennessee town looks to change name to Rocky Top

  • Investors have proposed multimillion-dollar project to transform town

  • Copyright owners of the bluegrass song sue to block name change

  • "We just want to see this happen for the community," county commissioner says




Lake City, Tennessee (CNN) -- Two strangers came in with big promises and plans to save a dying town.


A multimillion-dollar water park. A 3-D interactive theater. A pirate-themed restaurant. A country music theater to draw singers. And that's not all: an athletic complex to host children's leagues and a sports museum honoring University of Tennessee athletics. A fancy hotel. And an amusement park.


Think Dollywood.


Branson, Missouri.


Disney World.


All of it can be yours, on one condition: Change your town's name.


To Rocky Top!


That coveted name in eastern Tennessee. The name of the famed bluegrass song that rises from Neyland Stadium in Knoxville on Saturday afternoons, when 100,000 Tennessee football fans join with the university band and sing out in jubilation, their raucous cheers winding down the Tennessee River and cascading over the Smoky Mountains.


Rocky top, you'll always beHome sweet home to me.Good ole Rocky top,Rocky top Tennessee, Rocky top Tennessee.


This town of 1,800 nestled in the Appalachians mountains about 30 miles northwest of Knoxville changed its name once before, in 1936. The city leaders thought a name change would help draw tourists when the Tennessee Valley Authority put in a dam and a manmade lake several miles away. The proud mining town switched from Coal Creek to Lake City.


There is no lake in Lake City. If the tourists ever came, they left a long time ago. Like so much of small-town America, today there are few jobs, no industry and a cycle of poverty that engulfs the area. When the high school closed in the early 1980s, businesses soon followed.


Today, the median income sits around $14,000 a year. Methamphetamine abuse is so rampant, residents call their home the meth capital of Appalachia.


The downtown has two florists and a few other businesses, but most of the buildings are dilapidated. Chapman Restaurant was once a thriving place where locals came for supper. Now, its walls stand as a facade, a sign of what once was.


The best thing the tiny town has going for it is two exits off Interstate 75 -- a developer's dream. That's what got the attention of the developers of Rocky Top.


They had pitched their plan before. The people in Townsend sent them packing.


But in Lake City, they found many eager townspeople, wanting jobs and willing to call their home by a different name. More than 500 people packed Main Street Baptist Church last fall for a bean and cornbread social. Most were interested in the venture, but not everybody.


"Get rid of the drugs!" one woman hollered. "Stop the drugs!"


The plans were approved. The town grew excited.


Less excited were the owners of the song's copyright and property trademark. They filed suit to block the name change.


"Rocky Top is a world-famous and distinctive mark that popularly conjures notions of the copyrighted song owned by House of Bryant," says the suit, filed in U.S. District Court. "Lake City's attempt to change its name to Rocky Top represents an unlawful government taking and violation of House of Bryant's due process rights."


Judge Thomas A. Varlan heard legal arguments Monday in Knoxville on whether to issue a preliminary injunction that would put the plans on hold -- a decision that could, perhaps, decide the fate of the town. The judge took the case under advisement and will issue his ruling later, court clerk Julie Norwood said.


The fight here is very real. It pits those wanting what they feel is best for the town against those who cherish its storied history, when forebears in the coal mines fought a war against the Tennessee National Guard.


And the name change raises serious questions. At what lengths should a town go to try to save its economy? In an era when sports franchises sell the names of stadiums to the highest bidders, does the fight in Lake City foreshadow something greater in America? What if Microsoft threatened to leave the city of Redmond, Washington, if it didn't change its name?


And will changing the town name to Rocky Top lead to prosperity or broken promises?


A haven for 'poor man's cocaine'


George Robinson has clipped hair for 43 years at City Barber Shop. He points to a mud puddle out front that's been there ever since he opened. When cars go by, "it splashes plumb to the top."


If the puddle ain't been fixed all these years, pardon him for being a bit skeptical. Don't get him wrong. He's all for the project "if it materializes like it's supposed to."




George Robinson has clipped hair in Lake City for 43 years. He\'s for the project \

George Robinson has clipped hair in Lake City for 43 years. He's for the project "if it materializes like it's supposed to."



"I'm waiting to see somebody exchange some money," the barber says.


A stuffed wild turkey with a 6-inch gobbler stares from the wall. His dog Buddy, a pit bull mix, ambles over, sniffs a stranger's knees and huffs before moseying back to his red canopy bed.


"I think it's a silly-ass name," says Ricky Seeber.


The others in the shop kick heels and laugh.


Seeber hails from a mining family; his dad and grandparents worked the mines. Seeber didn't like how the developers came in with their ultimatum: "No name change, no jobs. That's about what it amounted to."


"Just the name change: I don't like it," he says.


"Yeah, Rocky Top," another snorts.


"You too, George?"


The barber pauses with his clippers. He's seen the town go from a fine community 40 years ago to where it is now: a haven for "poor man's cocaine."


"If it can help young people get a job, it don't bother me," he says. "Used to be a booming place."


From what the barber sees and hears, he guesses about 75% of the town is ready to go all Rocky Top. "About everybody is for it, because they see that the town is continuously going down."


"But when it opens up," Seeber chimes in, "it might be more than what you wanted."


"Yeah, well, like everything else," the barber says, "you gotta take the good with the bad. As long as it brings in the work, everybody's for it."


The clippers buzz. Buddy sits largely oblivious, drifting in and out of sleep, glancing up only when an occasional truck drives by.


Rocky Top is the talk in town. The week CNN visited, the Tennessee state House and Senate approved the name change. Eighteen eighth-graders were bused to the state capitol in Nashville to witness the historic House vote.


The City Council now must ratify the legislature's approval, but it has said it won't act until the judge makes a decision on the lawsuit.


The House of Bryant, owned by the sons of Boudleaux and Felice Bryant, who wrote "Rocky Top," said they felt that they had "no choice but to commence a lawsuit" after "their efforts to reach an understanding with Lake City" were unsuccessful.


"The Bryants," the family said in a written statement, "hope that this matter can be resolved quickly."


Two interstate exits and a huge opportunity


Anderson County Commissioner Tim Isbel shows off an array of impressive artistic renditions of the various phases of the Rocky Top plans, including a renovation of the entire downtown district that would transform it into one of the nicest-looking small towns in the South.


There are drawings of the water park, including an indoor pavilion that will bring in light and produce four rainbows at all times, and other big plans. The first phase is estimated to cost $20 million; all four phases, including the amusement park, could cost upward of $450 million, he says.


It's easy to see why a town that has so little is so eager. The development is projected to create 175 to 225 jobs and bring in $50 million in revenue, including $6 million in taxes for the town. Lake City's current annual budget is $3 million.


"We just see this as an opportunity to get this end of the county back to what it used to be. Give individuals places to work," Isbel says.


Does he have any nostalgia for the loss of the name Lake City?


"We just want to see this happen for the community," Isbel says. "There's just so much magic in the name. Not the song, the name Rocky Top."


The new name also speaks to the region's mining heritage, he says. "Where does any coal come from? It comes from a rocky top."


Isbel formed the Rocky Top Tennessee Marketing and Manufacturing Co. last year after the two original developers, Buddy Warren and Brad Coriell, proposed the idea. Warren was in a traumatic car crash late in the fall and is no longer part of the development, Isbel says.


Isbel has brought together eight prominent families -- "the dream team" -- as members of his board. The other original developer, Coriell, an artist based out of Nashville, also sits on the board.


Isbel emphasizes that this is not pie-in-the-sky stuff, that he believes this is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to save the town. Everyone on the board, aside from Coriell, lives in the area and has "a vested interest in making this community better."


"They want to give back and do what they can to get this venture started."


Isbel almost gets misty-eyed when he recalls an event at the middle school. He had come prepared to talk about the rides and other fun stuff that may eventually come to town. None of the kids asked about that. They wanted to know whether there would be jobs available when they graduate high school.


In 18 months, he told them, the water park will open (assuming the lawsuit doesn't block Rocky Top).


Winding down the roads of Lake City, Isbel points out the 300 acres where the water park would go and the eventual sites of the rest of the development.


"What other town do you see that has two exits and has all this available area?"


Lake City Vice Mayor Michael Lovely has longtime roots. His father was the mayor for decades and is the one who was instrumental in getting both exits off the interstate. Back then, his father was teased by locals: Why did this tiny town need two exits?


"They kinda gave him a hard time," Lovely says. "That's just what I'm saying. He seen the future."


'Embrace your heritage'


At the top of Militia Hill, Barry Thacker looks down upon the town. He can hardly contain his disdain for all that has transpired.




Barry Thacker overlooks Lake City from Militia Hill. \

Barry Thacker overlooks Lake City from Militia Hill. "You embrace your heritage. You don't run away from it."



As the head of the Coal Creek Watershed Foundation, by accident Thacker helped bring about the whole Rocky Top thing. And he hates it.


Thacker and others had worked for years to get a building suitable for a state-of-the-art Coal Creek Miner's Museum, a place that would honor the region's mining past.


That building was finally secured last year, and officials celebrated the feat. It drew media attention -- and that's what caught the attention of the Rocky Top developers. They licked their chops at the two interstate exists and the vast land available.


To Thacker, it feels like the miner's museum -- which will still go ahead -- got lost amid the fray. Plus, changing the town name to Rocky Top is just stupid, he says.


"You embrace your heritage. You don't run away from it. They made the mistake once before; they changed the name from its heritage to Lake City. It didn't bring tourists. Now, they're doing it again."


You get the feeling Thacker wants to spit. It's left that bad of a taste in his mouth.


"Don't embrace the words of a song to try to make yourself into something you're not," he says. "And that's what I see it doing. The only way you get out of this poverty is to get an education and get the kids to college so they can qualify for high-paying jobs. But none of that seems to be the focus."


A renowned engineer based out of Knoxville, Thacker knows that when something sounds too good to be true, it usually is. He fears land speculation and the possibility the development may never come to fruition. Already, one local has gone from a $500,000 asking price for his property to $3 million.


Fixing the schools and educating the area children, Thacker says, would be money better spent. But that's a much tougher fight.


"You're dang right," he says.


His foundation teamed up with the nearby community of Briceville to provide the local schoolchildren a way out. Over the past decade, the foundation sent 33 youths to college on nearly $300,000 in scholarships.


"It's a dedicated effort to get the kids to college that I'm afraid those in Lake City have convinced everybody you don't need to do that," he says. "Their message is, 'Rocky Top will do it for you.' I just think that's the wrong message."


Thacker helped preserve Militia Hill, where he now stands. It was here where miners fought the Tennessee National Guard in 1891 in what is known as the Coal Creek War.


The mining companies had brought in prisoners to work the mines for free. The miners took up arms, eventually capturing the convicts and the guards and putting them on a train back to Knoxville. They sent a telegram to the governor: Convicts aren't going to steal our jobs.


The governor dispatched the Tennessee National Guard. The war ensued. Battles and skirmishes lasted over a year. The miners lost the war but won the long-term battle. Mining companies were ordered to stop using convicts.


But tragedy struck on May 19, 1902, when a mine explosion killed 216 men -- leaving only three men alive in the community of Fraterville. It remains one of the largest mine disasters in U.S. history.


At 93, Louise Nelson is one of the closest descendants to that disaster. Her great-grandmother had five caskets in her home at one time, "because five of her boys were killed."


Nelson had wanted to go to the state legislature for years to propose changing the name of Lake City back to its Coal Creek origins. But she felt that she didn't have the political muscle.


She wishes she'd pushed harder. "This is the heritage of so many people and all those people killed in that mine. I just feel like it's desecrating their names and everything by changing the name to Rocky Top."


She chooses her words cautiously. She's too polite to let on how angry the name change makes her.


"I'm speaking up because there's not many of us left," says Nelson. "It's a sadness with me. A hurtfulness. I feel like I have to stand up for my grandparents and all these people and my heritage. I don't believe in staying in the past. You get nowhere with that, but I do want to preserve my heritage."


To her, Rocky Top will never be home sweet home.



American Legion cites CNN reports





  • The American Legion and Concerned Veterans for America call for the resignations

  • Eric K. Shinseki is the Secretary of Veterans Affairs

  • CNN has been reporting on veterans who have died waiting for care at VA hospitals

  • VA on Shinseki: "Nobody is more committed to completing the work that lies ahead"




Washington (CNN) -- The nation's largest veteran organization, The American Legion, and one other veterans group, Concerned Veterans for America, on Monday called for the resignation of Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric K. Shinseki.


The calls for his resignation came after months of CNN exclusive reporting on U.S. veterans who have died while waiting for care at VA hospitals across the country, including in Phoenix.


"It's not something we do lightly. But we do so today because it is our responsibility as advocate for the men and women who have worn this nation's uniform," said Daniel M. Dellinger, national commander of the American Legion, speaking in Indianapolis.


Responding to the legion's call for the secretary's resignation, the VA issued a statement late Monday:


"Secretary Shinseki has dedicated his life to his fellow veterans, and nobody is more committed to completing the work that lies ahead," said a VA statement by Drew Brookie, VA spokesman. "As the secretary says, providing veterans the quality care and benefits they have earned through their service is our only mission at VA."





Rep. Miller responds to VA investigation




Why won't the VA's Shinseki talk to CNN?




Director of Phoenix VA placed on leave




VA official: There's no secret list

The White House also responded with a statement: "The President remains confident in Secretary Shinseki's ability to lead the department."


CNN's ongoing look at health care for veterans


CNN has been reporting on delays in care and patient deaths at VA hospitals for the past six months, including at hospitals South Carolina, Georgia and Texas.


After CNN's coverage, the VA acknowledged this April that 23 veterans had died as a result of delayed care in recent years. But sources tell CNN that number could be much higher.


In an exclusive report two weeks ago, CNN interviewed a retired VA doctor from Phoenix who charged that more than 40 American veterans have died waiting for care at the VA hospital there.


A fatal wait: Veterans languish and die on a secret list


Many of the veterans, the doctor and other VA sources told CNN, were placed on a secret list created by VA managers to hide the wait times of veterans seeking medical care.


VA officials in Phoenix denied there was any secret list or that they had given any orders to cover up or hide wait times. They acknowledged that veterans had died waiting for care but said they did not know whether those deaths were tied to waiting for care.


But following those reports on Friday, Shinseki placed the Phoenix VA Director Sharon Helman and two members of her staff on administrative leave.


On Monday, Dillinger of the American Legion said that growing concerns about the problems at numerous VA facilities are what led him to call for the resignation of Shinseki and two other top VA officials: Under Secretary of Health Robert Petzel and Under Secretary of Benefits Allison Hickey.


"These disturbing reports are part of what appear to be a pattern of scandals that has infected the entire system," Dillinger said Monday.


Another VA facility under the spotlight


Also Monday, the Fort Collins, Colorado, VA facility came under scrutiny as concerns were raised that officials there might have allegedly instructed workers to change records in an effort to make veterans' wait times appear less severe.


"The House Committee on Veterans' Affairs has learned of appointment scheduling manipulation occurring at the Fort Collins, Colorado, Community Based Outpatient Clinic that is remarkably similar to issues recently referred to you regarding the Phoenix VA Medical Center," stated a letter to the VA's Office of Inspector General and signed by U.S. Rep. Mike Rogers of Michigan, chairman of the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.


The director of health care at the U.S. Government Accountability Office, Congress' watchdog organization, told CNN on Monday that even the VA does not truly know how many American veterans are waiting for care across the country.


Director Debra Draper said that's because they do not keep careful track of how many "consults" or doctor-requested appointments are open at any given time. Draper said some of the VA numbers and details of wait times are "unreliable."


The VA reported that in just the last year, it basically cleared 1.5 million backlogged orders of patient care or services, which they call consults, but Draper said there is no way of knowing why they were closed.


Draper said it is "a little disconcerting that 1.5 million records were closed. ... We can't determine that they did a review, a clinical review and appropriately closed out the consult."


She added that to find out how many consults have been truly closed, "you'd have to really go back to each individual patient record and see how the consult, why it was closed.


Rebuffed on repeated interview requests


Throughout the network's reporting, CNN has submitted numerous requests for an interview with Shinseki.


Yet in the six months that CNN has been reporting on these delays, Shinseki has not publicly spoken about the issue.


CNN is not alone in getting virtually no response from VA officials.


U.S. Rep. Jeff Miller of Florida, chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee, issued this statement late Monday:


"For nearly a year, we have been pleading with top department leaders and President Obama to take immediate steps to stop the growing pattern of preventable veteran deaths and hold accountable any and all VA employees who have allowed patients to slip through the cracks.


"In response, we've received disturbing silence from the White House and one excuse after another from VA."


Brookie's statement, released by the VA late Monday, read:


"The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) takes any allegations about patient care or employee misconduct very seriously. If the VA Office of Inspector General's investigation substantiates allegations of employee misconduct, swift and appropriate action will be taken. Veterans deserve to have full faith in their VA care.


"Under the leadership of Secretary Shinseki and his team, VA has made strong progress in recent years to better serve veterans both now and in the future. The secretary knows there is more work to do.


"VA's progress includes enrolling 2 million more veterans in high-quality VA health care, reducing veterans' homelessness by 24 percent, providing post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to more than 1 million students, and decreasing the disability claims backlog by nearly 50 percent."


But veterans groups were not convinced. Late Monday, another veterans group joined the American Legion in the call for Shinseki to resign.


Pete Hegseth, CEO of the Concerned Veterans of America, issued the following statement:


"We're proud to stand with The American Legion as they take this courageous and historic stand. As America's largest veterans organization, their moral authority on this issue is unimpeachable. We applaud their demands for accountability at the very top of the Department of Veterans Affairs."


Tears, angry accusations mark hearing on delayed VA care


January: Veterans dying because of health care delays


January: Congress demands answers


November: A dire situation in South Carolina



Justices walk a tricky line





  • Two residents of Greece, New York, objected to invocations at town board meetings

  • Opening meetings with traditional prayer doesn't violate First Amendment, high court says

  • Dissent warns of "government-sponsored worship that divides" citizens "along religious lines"

  • Ruling offers little on how other communities should offer civic prayers




(CNN) -- The Supreme Court gave limited approval on Monday to public prayers at a New York town's board meetings, citing the country's history of religious acknowledgment in the legislature.


The 5-4 ruling came in yet another contentious case over the intersection of faith and the civic arena. It was confined to the specific circumstances and offered few bright-line rules on how other communities should offer civic prayers without violating the Constitution.


Two local women sued officials in Greece, New York, objecting to invocations at monthly public sessions on government property. The invocations, according to the plaintiffs, have been overwhelmingly Christian in nature over the years.


"The town of Greece does not violate the First Amendment by opening its meetings with prayer that comports with our tradition," Justice Anthony Kennedy said, "and does not coerce participation by nonadherents."


Just moments before the opinion was announced from the bench, the high court began its public session as it has for decades: with the marshal invoking a traditional statement that ends, "God save the United States and this honorable court." The several hundred people in attendance, along with the justices, stood for the brief ceremony.









The justices of the U.S. Supreme Court sit for their official photograph on October 8, 2010, at the Supreme Court. Front row, from left: Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Anthony M. Kennedy and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Back row, from left: Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito Jr. and Elena Kagan.The justices of the U.S. Supreme Court sit for their official photograph on October 8, 2010, at the Supreme Court. Front row, from left: Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Anthony M. Kennedy and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Back row, from left: Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito Jr. and Elena Kagan.



In 2005, Chief Justice John G. Roberts was nominated by President George W. Bush to succeed Justice Sandra Day O'Connor as an associate justice. After Chief Justice William Rehnquist died, however, Bush named Roberts to the chief justice post. The court has moved to the right during his tenure, although Roberts supplied the key vote to uphold President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act.In 2005, Chief Justice John G. Roberts was nominated by President George W. Bush to succeed Justice Sandra Day O'Connor as an associate justice. After Chief Justice William Rehnquist died, however, Bush named Roberts to the chief justice post. The court has moved to the right during his tenure, although Roberts supplied the key vote to uphold President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act.



Justice Antonin Scalia was appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1986 to fill the seat vacated by Justice William Rehnquist when he was elevated to chief justice. A constitutional originalist -- and a colorful orator -- Scalia is a member of the court's conservative wing. He is currently the court's longest-serving justice.Justice Antonin Scalia was appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1986 to fill the seat vacated by Justice William Rehnquist when he was elevated to chief justice. A constitutional originalist -- and a colorful orator -- Scalia is a member of the court's conservative wing. He is currently the court's longest-serving justice.



Justice Anthony M. Kennedy was appointed to the court by President Ronald Reagan in 1988. He is a conservative justice but has provided crucial swing votes in many cases, writing the majority opinion, for example, in Lawrence v. Texas, which struck down that state's sodomy law. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy was appointed to the court by President Ronald Reagan in 1988. He is a conservative justice but has provided crucial swing votes in many cases, writing the majority opinion, for example, in Lawrence v. Texas, which struck down that state's sodomy law.



Justice Clarence Thomas is the second African-American to serve on the court, succeeding Justice Thurgood Marshall when he was appointed by President George H. W. Bush in 1991. He is a conservative, a strict constructionist who supports states' rights.Justice Clarence Thomas is the second African-American to serve on the court, succeeding Justice Thurgood Marshall when he was appointed by President George H. W. Bush in 1991. He is a conservative, a strict constructionist who supports states' rights.



Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is the second woman to serve on the Supreme Court. Appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1993, she is a strong voice in the court's liberal minority.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is the second woman to serve on the Supreme Court. Appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1993, she is a strong voice in the court's liberal minority.



Justice Stephen G. Breyer was appointed to the court in 1994 by President Bill Clinton. He is considered a member of the court's liberal minority.Justice Stephen G. Breyer was appointed to the court in 1994 by President Bill Clinton. He is considered a member of the court's liberal minority.



Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2006 and is known as one of the most conservative justices to serve on the court in modern times.Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2006 and is known as one of the most conservative justices to serve on the court in modern times.



Justice Sonia Sotomayor is the court's first Hispanic and third female justice. She was appointed by President Barack Obama in 2009 and is regarded as a resolutely liberal member of the court.Justice Sonia Sotomayor is the court's first Hispanic and third female justice. She was appointed by President Barack Obama in 2009 and is regarded as a resolutely liberal member of the court.



Justice Elena Kagan is the fourth female justice and a member of the court's liberal wing. She was appointed in 2010, at the age of 50, by President Barack Obama and is the court's youngest member.Justice Elena Kagan is the fourth female justice and a member of the court's liberal wing. She was appointed in 2010, at the age of 50, by President Barack Obama and is the court's youngest member.




Photos: Today\'s Supreme CourtPhotos: Today's Supreme Court










Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013): The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal over California's Proposition 8 on jurisdictional grounds. The voter-approved ballot measure barring same-sex marriage was not defended by state officials, but rather a private party. This ruling cleared the way for same-sex marriage in California to resume, but left open-ended the legal language of 35 other states barring same-sex marriage. Take a look at other important cases decided by the high court.Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013): The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal over California's Proposition 8 on jurisdictional grounds. The voter-approved ballot measure barring same-sex marriage was not defended by state officials, but rather a private party. This ruling cleared the way for same-sex marriage in California to resume, but left open-ended the legal language of 35 other states barring same-sex marriage. Take a look at other important cases decided by the high court.



United States v. Windsor (2013): When her wife died in 2009, Edith Windsor, 84, was forced to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in estate taxes because her marriage was not recognized by the federal government's Defense of Marriage Act of 1996. The Supreme Court struck down the part of the law which denied legally marriage same-sex couples the same federal benefits provided to heterosexual spouses.United States v. Windsor (2013): When her wife died in 2009, Edith Windsor, 84, was forced to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in estate taxes because her marriage was not recognized by the federal government's Defense of Marriage Act of 1996. The Supreme Court struck down the part of the law which denied legally marriage same-sex couples the same federal benefits provided to heterosexual spouses.



National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012): The Supreme Court upheld most of the Affordable Care Act, the Obama administration's health care reform law, on June 28, 2012. The decision determined how hundreds of millions of Americans will receive health care.National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012): The Supreme Court upheld most of the Affordable Care Act, the Obama administration's health care reform law, on June 28, 2012. The decision determined how hundreds of millions of Americans will receive health care.



Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010): Activists rally in February 2012 to urge the Supreme Court to overturn its decision that fundamentally changed campaign finance law by allowing corporations and unions to contribute unlimited funds to political action committees not affiliated with a candidate.Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010): Activists rally in February 2012 to urge the Supreme Court to overturn its decision that fundamentally changed campaign finance law by allowing corporations and unions to contribute unlimited funds to political action committees not affiliated with a candidate.



Texas v. Johnson (1989): The Supreme Court overturned the decision that convicted Gregory Lee Johnson of desecrating a venerated object after he set an American flag on fire during a protest. The court ruled that Johnson (at right with his lawyer, William Kunstler) was protected under the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. Texas v. Johnson (1989): The Supreme Court overturned the decision that convicted Gregory Lee Johnson of desecrating a venerated object after he set an American flag on fire during a protest. The court ruled that Johnson (at right with his lawyer, William Kunstler) was protected under the First Amendment right to freedom of speech.




United States v. Nixon (1974): When President Richard Nixon claimed executive privilege over taped conversations regarding the Watergate scandal, the Supreme Court ruled that he had to turn over the tapes and other documents. The ruling set a precedent limiting the power of the president of the United States.

United States v. Nixon (1974): When President Richard Nixon claimed executive privilege over taped conversations regarding the Watergate scandal, the Supreme Court ruled that he had to turn over the tapes and other documents. The ruling set a precedent limiting the power of the president of the United States.



Roe v. Wade (1973): Norma McCorvey, identified as "Jane Roe," sued Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade over a law that made it a felony to have an abortion unless the life of the mother was in danger. The court agreed with Roe and overruled any laws that made abortion illegal in the first trimester. Here, McCorvey, left, stands with her attorney Gloria Allred in 1989.Roe v. Wade (1973): Norma McCorvey, identified as "Jane Roe," sued Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade over a law that made it a felony to have an abortion unless the life of the mother was in danger. The court agreed with Roe and overruled any laws that made abortion illegal in the first trimester. Here, McCorvey, left, stands with her attorney Gloria Allred in 1989.



Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Ernesto Miranda confessed to a crime without the police informing him of his right to an attorney or right against self-incrimination. His attorney argued in court that the confession should have been inadmissible, and in 1966, the Supreme Court agreed. The term "Miranda rights" has been used since. Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Ernesto Miranda confessed to a crime without the police informing him of his right to an attorney or right against self-incrimination. His attorney argued in court that the confession should have been inadmissible, and in 1966, the Supreme Court agreed. The term "Miranda rights" has been used since.



Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): The Supreme Court overturned the burglary conviction of Clarence Earl Gideon after he wrote to the court from his prison cell, explaining he was denied the right to an attorney at his 1961 trial. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): The Supreme Court overturned the burglary conviction of Clarence Earl Gideon after he wrote to the court from his prison cell, explaining he was denied the right to an attorney at his 1961 trial.



Mapp v. Ohio (1961): The Supreme Court overturned the conviction of Dollree Mapp because the evidence collected against her was obtained during an illegal search. The ruling re-evaluated the Fourth Amendment, which protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures.Mapp v. Ohio (1961): The Supreme Court overturned the conviction of Dollree Mapp because the evidence collected against her was obtained during an illegal search. The ruling re-evaluated the Fourth Amendment, which protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures.



Brown v. Board of Education (1954): Nathaniel Steward recites his lesson surrounded by white classmates at the Saint-Dominique School in Washington. In Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to separate students based on race. Brown v. Board of Education (1954): Nathaniel Steward recites his lesson surrounded by white classmates at the Saint-Dominique School in Washington. In Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to separate students based on race.



Korematsu v. United States (1944): Fred Korematsu, a Japanese-American man, was arrested after authorities found out that he claimed to be a Mexican-American to avoid an internment camp during World War II. The court ruled that the rights of an individual were not as important as the need to protect the country during wartime. In 1998, President Bill Clinton awarded Korematsu the Presidential Medal of Freedom.Korematsu v. United States (1944): Fred Korematsu, a Japanese-American man, was arrested after authorities found out that he claimed to be a Mexican-American to avoid an internment camp during World War II. The court ruled that the rights of an individual were not as important as the need to protect the country during wartime. In 1998, President Bill Clinton awarded Korematsu the Presidential Medal of Freedom.



Plessy v. Ferguson (1896): Homer Plessy was arrested when he refused to leave a whites-only segregated train car, claiming he was 7/8 white and only 1/8 black. The Supreme Court ruled that "separate but equal" facilities for blacks were constitutional, which remained the rule until Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.Plessy v. Ferguson (1896): Homer Plessy was arrested when he refused to leave a whites-only segregated train car, claiming he was 7/8 white and only 1/8 black. The Supreme Court ruled that "separate but equal" facilities for blacks were constitutional, which remained the rule until Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.



Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857): When Dred Scott asked a circuit court to reward him his freedom after moving to a free state, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress didn't have the right to prohibit slavery and, further, that those of African-American descent were not protected by the Constitution. Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857): When Dred Scott asked a circuit court to reward him his freedom after moving to a free state, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress didn't have the right to prohibit slavery and, further, that those of African-American descent were not protected by the Constitution.



Gibbons v. Ogden (1824): This was the first case to establish Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce. The ruling signaled a shift in power from the states to the federal government. Aaron Ogden, seen here, was given exclusive permission from the state of New York to navigate the waters between New York and certain New Jersey ports. When Ogden brought a lawsuit against Thomas Gibbons for operating steamships in his waters, the Supreme Court sided with Gibbons.Gibbons v. Ogden (1824): This was the first case to establish Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce. The ruling signaled a shift in power from the states to the federal government. Aaron Ogden, seen here, was given exclusive permission from the state of New York to navigate the waters between New York and certain New Jersey ports. When Ogden brought a lawsuit against Thomas Gibbons for operating steamships in his waters, the Supreme Court sided with Gibbons.



McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): In response to the federal government's controversial decision to institute a national bank in the state, Maryland tried to tax the bank out of business. When a federal bank cashier, James W. McCulloch, refused to pay the taxes, the state of Maryland filed charges against him. In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court ruled that chartering a bank was an implied power of the Constitution. The first national bank, pictured, was created by Congress in 1791 in Philadelphia. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): In response to the federal government's controversial decision to institute a national bank in the state, Maryland tried to tax the bank out of business. When a federal bank cashier, James W. McCulloch, refused to pay the taxes, the state of Maryland filed charges against him. In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court ruled that chartering a bank was an implied power of the Constitution. The first national bank, pictured, was created by Congress in 1791 in Philadelphia.




Marbury v. Madison (1803): When Secretary of State James Madison, seen here, tried to stop Federal loyalists from being appointed to judicial positions, he was sued by William Marbury. Marbury was one of former President John Adams' appointees, and the court decided that although he had a right to the position, the court couldn't enforce his appointment. The case defined the boundaries of the executive and judicial branches of government.

Marbury v. Madison (1803): When Secretary of State James Madison, seen here, tried to stop Federal loyalists from being appointed to judicial positions, he was sued by William Marbury. Marbury was one of former President John Adams' appointees, and the court decided that although he had a right to the position, the court couldn't enforce his appointment. The case defined the boundaries of the executive and judicial branches of government.




Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America

Supreme Court cases that changed America






1



2



3



4



5



6



7



8



9



10



11



12



13



14



15



16



17




Photos: Supreme Court cases that changed AmericaPhotos: Supreme Court cases that changed America



The conservative majority offered varying interpretations of when such "ceremonial" prayers would be permissible. Kennedy, along with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, focused on the specifics of the Greece case and did not offer a broad expansion of legislative prayer.


Fellow conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia went further, suggesting that even any "subtle pressure" that local citizens might feel would not be enough to ban such prayers.


In dissent, Justice Elena Kagan said, "When the citizens of this country approach their government, they do so only as Americans, not as members of one faith or another. And that means that even in a partly legislative body, they should not confront government-sponsored worship that divides them along religious lines."


'It's just not appropriate'


The town of about 94,000 residents outside Rochester began allowing prayers to start its meetings in 1999, after years of having a "moment of silence."


Co-plaintiffs Linda Stephens and Susan Galloway challenged the revised policy, saying officials repeatedly ignored their requests to modify or eliminate the practice, or at least make it more inclusive.


"It's very divisive when you bring government into religion," Stephens told CNN from her home. "I don't believe in God, and Susan is Jewish, so to hear these ministers talk about Jesus and even have some of them who personally question our motives, it's just not appropriate."


The town government counters that after concerns from the two women and others, it sought diverse voices, including a Wiccan priestess, to offer invocations. Officials say they do not review the content of the remarks, nor censor any language.


"The faith of the prayer giver does not matter at all," said John Auberger, Greece's board supervisor, who began the practice shortly after taking office. "We accept anyone who wants to come in and volunteer to give the prayer to open up our town meetings."


A federal appeals court in New York found the board's policy to be a violation of the Constitution's Establishment Clause, which forbids any government "endorsement" of religion. Those judges said it had the effect of "affiliating the town with Christianity."


Congress and state legislatures regularly open their sessions with a prayer. The question in part before the court is whether local government bodies are different, in that there might be more active involvement with local residents, who may want to personally petition the town in zoning, tax and other matters.


Kagan suggested the court's ruling could lead to sectarian prayers at such government venues as trials, polling places, and naturalization ceremonies.


But Alito expressed concern "some readers will take these hypotheticals as a warning that this is where today's decision leads -- to a country in which religious minorities are denied the equal benefits of citizenship."


"Nothing could be further from the truth," added Alito. "All that the court does today is to allow a town to follow a practice that we have previously held is permissible for Congress and state legislatures."


Widely varying interpretations


Nearly 120 members of Congress, mostly Republicans, along with 18 state attorneys general, filed supporting legal briefs backing the city. The Obama administration did the same.


The high court has generally taken a case-by-case approach on determining just when the state intrudes unconstitutionally into religion, while generally allowing faith to be acknowledged in a limited basis in a public forum.


"In God We Trust" remains on currency; the Pledge of Allegiance and oaths of office mention a creator; and menorah and crèche displays are permitted in local parks.


But the justices, in their widely varying interpretations of this case, acknowledged the tricky line they must walk -- politically, socially, legally-- when deciding Establishment Clause appeals. It was Kennedy's views that ultimately controlled.


"By inviting ministers to serve as chaplain for the month, and welcoming them to the front of the room alongside civic leaders, the town is acknowledging the central place that religion, and religious institutions, hold in the lives of those present," he said. "Indeed, some congregations are not simply spiritual homes for town residents but also the provider of social services for citizens regardless of their beliefs."


The Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented the town in court, agreed.


"The Supreme Court has again affirmed that Americans are free to pray," said the group's senior counsel David Cortman. "In America, we tolerate a diversity of opinions and beliefs; we don't silence people or try to separate what they say from what they believe."


But the ACLU said it was disappointed. "Official religious favoritism should be off-limits under the Constitution," said the group's Daniel Mach. "Town-sponsored sectarian prayer violates the basic rule requiring the government to stay neutral on matters of faith."


The case of Town of Greece, NY v. Galloway (12-696).


Belief blog: Do religious minorities have a prayer?


In November: Top court not likely to block town prayers